Changeable Copy Signs
In 1997, the Baltimore County Council passed new legislation to regulate signs. It did not adequately address the just emerging technology of electronic changeable copy signs, but provided an exemption for "time and temperature" signs, which were common at banks. One of the provisions in the 1997 Bill was to provide a very generous 15-year abatement period for pre-existing signs which the bill made illegal. Unfortunately, the county staff has misused this abatement period to allow new signs to be installed which are in violation of the 1997 bill.
During the past several years, there has been an explosion of electronic changeable copy (ECC) signs. Many of these are now large video display screens displaying full motion graphics, and wild flashing, not the small, single color on a black background signs which were the norm in 1997. Although motion and scrolling of displays is clearly forbidden in the code established in 1997, Code Enforcement (and more importantly, the Hearing Officer) have not enforced the regulations. In fact, several years ago,the County Executive instructed Code Enforcement to not enforce the restrictions, but to take a wait-and-see attitude (i.e., wait to see what the County Council would do).
Meanwhile, at the direction of the Council, the Office of Planning and the Planning Board studied this issue and held public hearings. As a result, they recommended that there should be a limit of one change per hour for these signs (and the prohibition on motion and scrolling should be retained). Based on that recommendation, the County Council introduced Bill 106-08 containing a limit of one change per half hour.
There were further public hearings and testimony before the Council and the bill was acted on at the November 3, 2008 meeting. To the complete surprise and shock of most everyone, an amendment was introduced to change the 30-minute limit in the bill to 15 seconds, which passed 4-3!
In addition to this surprising and completely unacceptable 15-second limit, there are numerous other mistakes and short-comings in the new bill, among them being:
- There is no explicit limit for Billboards.
- There is a 180-day "abatement" period, which already has the effect of allowing another 180 days for those signs which have always been illegal (motion and scrolling).
- It did not correct a recently occurring problem in Kingsville in which the hearing officer ruled that a business existing before 1997 is not subject to any of these restrictions.
- While it was intended to include window signs in what is regulated, it did not do so in a way that will lead to proper enforcement.
- It does not sufficiently restrict the use of the "time and temperature" exemption.
- County agencies (schools, libraries, fire stations) were not made subject to the restrictions as strongly recommended by the Planning Board.
Since the new bill went into complete effect on June 25, 2009, Code Enforcement has been very slow to enforce the new (and previous) provisions. Many signs in violation of the 15-second rule or the prohibition against motion have required 6 or 8 compliants before they were corrected.
|
|